Skip to main content

AS9022

TWL-KOM-AS

Donnersbergweg 4

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
9022
Name
TWL-KOM-AS
Organisation
Donnersbergweg 4
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

10

IPv6 prefixes

2

Total announced

12

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS9022
212.21.160.0/19 IPv4 /19 not checked
109.73.48.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
217.151.144.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
188.94.96.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
80.208.232.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
185.10.192.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
194.180.28.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
193.97.137.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
194.77.149.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
91.198.187.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a00:a980::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a00:e58::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS9022
Address families
DE-CIX Frankfurt: DE-CIX Frankfurt Peering LAN 60,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS9022 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

26 networks seen before AS9022 in AS paths

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS9022 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

37 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.