Skip to main content

AS42841

ANTIK

ANTIK Telecom s.r.o

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
42841
Name
ANTIK
Organisation
ANTIK Telecom s.r.o
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

8

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

9

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS42841
88.212.0.0/18 IPv4 /18 not checked
88.212.0.0/19 IPv4 /19 not checked
88.212.32.0/19 IPv4 /19 not checked
88.212.0.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
88.212.16.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
88.212.32.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
88.212.48.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
185.61.16.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
2a02:130::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS42841
Address families
AMS-IX 20,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
DE-CIX Frankfurt: DE-CIX Frankfurt Peering LAN 400,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
NIX.CZ: Public peering VLAN 100,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
NIX.SK 100,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
Peering.cz 140,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
SIX.SK 200,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
SIX.SK Košice 1,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS42841 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

45 networks seen before AS42841 in AS paths

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS42841 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

47 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.