Skip to main content

AS196968

ILM-PROVIDER-AS

---------------------------------------------

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
196968
Name
ILM-PROVIDER-AS
Organisation
---------------------------------------------
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

6

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

6

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS196968
176.10.48.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
178.21.0.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
199.247.56.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
162.208.52.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
185.69.180.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
217.61.232.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS196968
Address families
BCIX: BCIX Peering LAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
DE-CIX Dusseldorf: DE-CIX Dusseldorf Peering LAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
DE-CIX Frankfurt: DE-CIX Frankfurt Peering LAN 100,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
DE-CIX Hamburg: DE-CIX Hamburg Peering LAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4
DE-CIX Munich: DE-CIX Munich Peering LAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS196968 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

34 networks seen before AS196968 in AS paths

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS196968 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

56 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.