Skip to main content

AS9355

NICT

National Institute of Information and Communications Technology

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
9355
Name
NICT
Organisation
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology
Country
Flag of Japan JP Japan
RIR
APNIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS9355
133.140.0.0/16 IPv4 /16 not checked
133.243.0.0/16 IPv4 /16 not checked
2001:df0:232::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS9355
Address families
JPIX TOKYO 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS9355 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

3 networks seen before AS9355 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS2907 SINET-AS 299 779
v4 v6
AS6939 HURRICANE 120 181
v4 v6
AS7660 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS9355 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS17934 5 14
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Uncertain adjacencies

9 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 22
v4 v6
AS1828 UNITAS 2 5
v4 v6
AS4777 APNIC-COLO 2 5
v4 v6
AS38001 NEWMEDIAEXPRESS-AS-AP 2 5
v4 v6
AS59105 2 5
v4 v6
AS36236 NETACTUATE 2 4
v4 v6
AS17934 1 3
v4 v6
AS35280 F5 1 2
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 2
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.