Skip to main content

AS61232

redit

***********************************************************

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
61232
Name
redit
Organisation
***********************************************************
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

6

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

7

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS61232
195.242.164.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
185.152.16.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.152.17.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.152.18.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.152.19.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
195.242.163.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a07:7cc0::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS61232
Address families
SwissIX: Peering 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS61232 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

10 networks seen before AS61232 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS6939 HURRICANE 224 1,836
v4 v6
AS15623 CYBERLINK 61 350
v4 v6
AS13030 INIT7 4 36
v4 v6
AS34019 HIVANE 3 34
v4 v6
AS48362 TKSWF-AS 2 28
v4 v6
AS5405 INTERDOTLINK 2 14
v4 v6
AS39351 ESAB-AS 2 14
v4 v6
AS9002 RETN-AS 5 9
v6
AS1764 NEXTLAYER-AS 1 7
v4 v6
AS1836 GREEN 1 7
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS61232 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS13030 INIT7 7 7
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Uncertain adjacencies

32 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.