Skip to main content

AS59891

FSIT

***********************************************************

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
59891
Name
FSIT
Organisation
***********************************************************
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

8

IPv6 prefixes

17

Total announced

25

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS59891
185.150.28.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.150.29.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.150.30.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.150.31.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.32.124.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.32.125.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.32.126.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.32.127.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a00:c1e0::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a00:c1e1::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a00:c1e2::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a00:c1e3::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a00:c1e4::/32 IPv6 /32 RPKI valid
2a00:c1e5::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a00:c1e6::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a00:c1e7::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a07:6d80::/32 IPv6 /32 RPKI valid
2a07:6d81::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a07:6d82::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a07:6d83::/32 IPv6 /32 RPKI valid
2a07:6d84::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a07:6d85::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a07:6d86::/32 IPv6 /32 RPKI valid
2a07:6d87::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2001:67c:17a4::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS59891
Address families
4b42 Internet Exchange Point: Switzerland 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
SwissIX: Peering 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
ixFabric - Amsterdam 1,000 Mbps IPv6
ixFabric - Dusseldorf 1,000 Mbps IPv6
ixFabric - Frankfurt 1,000 Mbps IPv6
ixFabric - Lyon 1,000 Mbps IPv6
ixFabric - Miami 1,000 Mbps IPv6
ixFabric - Singapore 1,000 Mbps IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS59891 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

11 networks seen before AS59891 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS13030 INIT7 51,511 470,564
v4 v6
AS6939 HURRICANE 74,932 427,092
v4 v6
AS51395 AS-SOFTPLUS 48,715 421,844
v4 v6
AS5405 INTERDOTLINK 1,504 7,769
v4 v6
AS1764 NEXTLAYER-AS 264 1,063
v4 v6
AS47147 AS-ANX 82 459
v4 v6
AS24961 MYLOC-AS 146 431
v4 v6
AS34019 HIVANE 38 271
v4 v6
AS9002 RETN-AS 12 232
v6
AS1836 GREEN 36 199
v4 v6
AS39351 ESAB-AS 30 178
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS59891 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS213418 bebrave 428 7,486
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

100 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS13335 CLOUDFLARENET 1,052 8,755
v4 v6
AS32787 PROLEXIC-TECHNOLOGIES-DDOS-MITIGATION-NETWORK 719 6,218
v4
AS15169 GOOGLE 19 5,318
v4 v6
AS16509 AMAZON-02 68 4,887
v4 v6
AS21215 UGNI 210 1,768
v4
AS8075 MICROSOFT-CORP-MSN-AS-BLOCK 8 1,481
v4 v6
AS16276 OVH 250 1,164
v4
AS15830 Equinix 258 1,005
v4
AS13237 LAMBDANET-AS 261 980
v4
AS63023 AS-GLOBALTELEHOST 42 916
v4
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 99 682
v4
AS8218 NEO-ASN 195 650
v4 v6
AS29075 IELO 135 447
v4
AS8218 NEO-ASN 2 322
v4 v6
AS4455 BSO 61 257
v4
AS47957 ING-AS 6 245
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 32 214
v4
AS25091 IP-Max 64 212
v4
AS15600 QUICKLINE 22 166
v4 v6
AS34177 CELESTE-AS 22 158
v4
AS36236 NETACTUATE 28 147
v4
AS58115 SWISSIX-OUTREACH 38 144
v4
AS559 Switch 6 138
v4
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 2 138
v4 v6
AS25091 IP-Max 2 138
v4 v6
AS8801 ROCKETFIBRE 39 124
v4 v6
AS20940 AKAMAI-ASN1 3 113
v4
AS19551 INCAPSULA 3 107
v4
AS8648 ONE-NETWORK 9 104
v4
AS49121 INFTELE-AS 18 101
v4
AS62044 ZSCALER-EMEA 1 99
v4
AS20612 SWISSIX 2 92
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 2 92
v4 v6
AS59890 Kabel-TV-Lampert 2 92
v4 v6
AS62167 Tismi 2 92
v4 v6
AS34347 CITYNET-AT-AS 14 90
v4
AS42 WOODYNET-1 3 84
v4 v6
AS8758 IWAY 21 78
v4
AS12387 TON 9 78
v4
AS58057 SECUREBIT 2 78
v4 v6
AS9044 SOLNET 14 76
v4
AS48362 TKSWF-AS 1 75
v4 v6
AS15576 NTS 16 68
v4
AS9009 M247 6 65
v4
AS15623 CYBERLINK 20 64
v4
AS15547 NETPLUS 1 57
v4 v6
AS15547 NETPLUS 9 56
v4
AS33965 LITECOM 13 54
v4 v6
AS200924 sis2 7 51
v4
AS29222 Infomaniak-AS 7 49
v4
AS24951 EVERYWARE-NET 7 47
v4
AS559 Switch 2 46
v4 v6
AS8298 IPNG 2 46
v4 v6
AS12307 RAVANA 2 46
v4 v6
AS15623 CYBERLINK 2 46
v4 v6
AS20932 SIG-ST 2 46
v4 v6
AS21232 GGAMAUR 2 46
v4 v6
AS29075 IELO 2 46
v4 v6
AS29691 NINE 2 46
v4 v6
AS34177 CELESTE-AS 2 46
v4 v6
AS35360 GARGUNET 2 46
v4 v6
AS36236 NETACTUATE 2 46
v4 v6
AS51873 AS-ARCADE 2 46
v4 v6
AS56987 AS-ABACLOUDA 2 46
v4 v6
AS57777 MASSAR 2 46
v4 v6
AS59414 CLOUDSCALE 2 46
v4 v6
AS196621 FREESTONE 2 46
v4 v6
AS209823 ENKI-AS 2 46
v4 v6
AS47176 GASCOMCH 17 45
v4
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 27 43
v4
AS213418 bebrave 1 42
v4 v6
AS8283 COLOCLUE-AS 26 39
v4
AS56987 AS-ABACLOUDA 12 38
v4
AS2906 AS-SSI 2 37
v4 v6
AS8298 IPNG 13 34
v4 v6
AS25369 BANDWIDTH-AS 7 33
v4
AS2686 ATGS-MMD-AS 8 32
v4 v6
AS198249 OPSONE 2 32
v6
AS8821 TELEZUG 7 30
v4 v6
AS29691 NINE 8 27
v4
AS212865 NETCONNECT 2 26
v4
AS31736 SENSELAN-AS 3 24
v4
AS48362 TKSWF-AS 12 23
v4
AS21232 GGAMAUR 1 21
v4 v6
AS59414 CLOUDSCALE 5 20
v4
AS44854 ERITAP-AS 6 18
v4
AS57043 HOSTKEY-AS 2 18
v4
AS61423 JMP-AS 9 17
v4
AS6772 IMPNET-AS 7 17
v4
AS198385 AlpineDC 7 17
v4
AS24889 MONZOON-AS 4 16
v4
AS41913 COMPUTERLINE 3 16
v4
AS29655 TRENKA 2 16
v4
AS31424 IN4U-AS 5 15
v4
AS48885 NEOCARRIER 4 15
v4
AS40627 RC-COLO1 1 15
v4
AS5385 RUSSMEDIA-IT 8 14
v4
AS31662 KNSurselva 3 14
v4
AS13237 LAMBDANET-AS 2 14
v4
AS198385 AlpineDC 2 14
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.