Skip to main content

AS269088

ASN269088

ESM NET INFORMATICA

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
269088
Name
ASN269088
Organisation
ESM NET INFORMATICA
Country
Flag of Brazil BR Brazil
RIR
—
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

3

IPv6 prefixes

3

Total announced

6

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS269088
45.179.100.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
45.179.100.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
45.179.102.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
2804:5f44::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2804:5f44:8000::/33 IPv6 /33 RPKI not found
2804:5f44::/33 IPv6 /33 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS269088 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

7 networks seen before AS269088 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS265135 ASN265135 441 1,000
v6
AS262300 ASN262300 224 880
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 28 96
v4
AS137409 GSLNETWORKS-AS-AP 2 9
v4 v6
AS6057 6057 2 8
v4 v6
AS7195 7195 1 1
v6
AS61626 ASN61626 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS269088 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

17 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.