Skip to main content

AS265969

ASN265969

FLAQUINET SERVICO DE COMUNICACAO MULTIMIDIA EIRELE

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
265969
Name
ASN265969
Organisation
FLAQUINET SERVICO DE COMUNICACAO MULTIMIDIA EIRELE
Country
Flag of Brazil BR Brazil
RIR
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

2

Total announced

4

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS265969
131.196.96.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
131.196.97.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2804:4098::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2804:4098:f200::/40 IPv6 /40 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS265969
Address families
IX.br (PTT.br) Rio de Janeiro: ATM/MPLA 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS265969 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

4 networks seen before AS265969 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS266094 488 1,310
v4 v6
AS6057 6057 2 8
v4 v6
AS7195 7195 2 4
v6
AS268624 1 2
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS265969 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

7 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS14840 ASN14840 1 16
v4 v6
AS35280 F5 1 4
v4 v6
AS264479 1 4
v4 v6
AS52320 52320 1 2
v6
AS52873 ASN52873 1 2
v4
AS262427 1 2
v4
AS271253 ASN271253 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.