Skip to main content

AS265656

265656

Autonomous System AS265656 from CL-ANWE-LACNIC

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
265656
Name
265656
Organisation
Autonomous System AS265656 from CL-ANWE-LACNIC
Country
—
RIR
LACNIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

1

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

2

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS265656
170.246.172.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
2803:56c0::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS265656
Address families
PIT Santiago - PIT Chile: LAN 2,000 Mbps IPv4
PIT Temuco - PIT Chile: LAN 2,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS265656 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

4 networks seen before AS265656 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS7049 7049 199 261
v4
AS27901 27901 152 250
v4 v6
AS6939 HURRICANE 111 158
v4 v6
AS6057 6057 2 4
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS265656 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

4 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 2
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 2
v4 v6
AS269956 269956 1 2
v4 v6
AS51185 MAINSTREAMING-AS 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.