Skip to main content

AS262690

ASN262690

Netwave Telecomunicações Ltda.

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
262690
Name
ASN262690
Organisation
Netwave Telecomunicações Ltda.
Country
Flag of Brazil BR Brazil
RIR
—
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

5

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

6

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS262690
187.87.240.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
187.87.240.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
187.87.244.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
187.87.248.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
187.87.252.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
2804:7348::/32 IPv6 /32 RPKI valid

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS262690
Address families
IX.br (PTT.br) São Paulo: ATM/MPLA — IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS262690 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

9 networks seen before AS262690 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS52840 ASN52840 269 497
v4 v6
AS52862 ASN52862 124 143
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 91 117
v6
AS35280 F5 9 36
v4 v6
AS137409 GSLNETWORKS-AS-AP 9 25
v4 v6
AS6057 6057 4 12
v4 v6
AS61626 ASN61626 1 4
v4 v6
AS39120 CONVERGENZE-AS 1 3
v4
AS7195 7195 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS262690 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

17 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.