Skip to main content

AS262655

ASN262655

Tribunal Regional do Trabalho 5a Região

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
262655
Name
ASN262655
Organisation
Tribunal Regional do Trabalho 5a Região
Country
Flag of Brazil BR Brazil
RIR
—
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

1

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

2

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS262655
177.87.100.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
2801:80:360::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS262655
Address families
IX.br (PTT.br) Fortaleza: ATM/MPLA 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
IX.br (PTT.br) Salvador: ATM/MPLA 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
IX.br (PTT.br) São Paulo: ATM/MPLA 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS262655 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

5 networks seen before AS262655 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS61568 ASN61568 297 430
v4 v6
AS14840 ASN14840 179 234
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 15 16
v4
AS6057 6057 2 2
v4
AS137409 GSLNETWORKS-AS-AP 2 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS262655 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

15 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.