Skip to main content

AS210861

ONA

== TRANSITS ==

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
210861
Name
ONA
Organisation
== TRANSITS ==
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

1

IPv6 prefixes

2

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS210861
93.190.126.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a11:7980::/40 IPv6 /40 RPKI valid
2a11:7980:ff::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS210861
Address families
SwissIX: Peering 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS210861 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

12 networks seen before AS210861 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS39040 NTSWorkspaceAG-AS39040 349 749
v4 v6
AS15576 NTS 47 129
v4 v6
AS9002 RETN-AS 7 22
v6
AS6939 HURRICANE 18 19
v4
AS34019 HIVANE 4 18
v4 v6
AS48362 TKSWF-AS 2 12
v4 v6
AS1764 NEXTLAYER-AS 2 9
v4 v6
AS47147 AS-ANX 2 7
v4 v6
AS39351 ESAB-AS 2 6
v4 v6
AS24961 MYLOC-AS 2 4
v4 v6
AS1836 GREEN 1 3
v4 v6
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 1 2
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS210861 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

32 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.