Skip to main content

AS206907

UAGROUP

---== Upstreams ===---

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
206907
Name
UAGROUP
Organisation
---== Upstreams ===---
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

2

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS206907
193.200.84.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
91.224.68.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS206907
Address families
1-IX EU 10,000 Mbps IPv4
DTEL-IX: PUBLIC 10,000 Mbps IPv4
Giganet IXN: Global exchange 10,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS206907 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

5 networks seen before AS206907 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS57455 Filanco-LTD-UA 217 422
v4
AS41435 UNDERNET-AS1 39 76
v4
AS50263 IXP-1-IX-EU 11 16
v4
AS3303 SWISSCOM 2 3
v4
AS1257 SWIPNET 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

2 networks seen after AS206907 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS211195 VAMNET 107 129
v4
AS39848 CITYLAN 2 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

4 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 2 6
v4
AS8218 NEO-ASN 1 4
v4
AS48919 UA-CITY-AS 1 2
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.