Skip to main content

AS196957

CITKH-AS

=====================================

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
196957
Name
CITKH-AS
Organisation
=====================================
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS196957
193.107.172.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
91.234.40.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
2001:67c:13b8::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS196957
Address families
DTEL-IX: PUBLIC 20,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
Giganet IXN Kharkіv: Kharkov local exchange 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
Giganet IXN: Global exchange 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS196957 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

5 networks seen before AS196957 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS62206 468 1,051
v4 v6
AS3303 SWISSCOM 16 34
v4 v6
AS6663 TTI-NET 1 3
v4 v6
AS8772 NLineLLC 1 1
v6
AS48648 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS196957 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

4 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 21
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 2 6
v4 v6
AS48919 1 3
v4 v6
AS209823 ENKI-AS 1 3
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.