Skip to main content

AS149672

IDNIC-FASTLINK-AS-ID

PT Aktech Digital Solutions

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
149672
Name
IDNIC-FASTLINK-AS-ID
Organisation
PT Aktech Digital Solutions
Country
Flag of Indonesia ID Indonesia
RIR
APNIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

4

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

5

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS149672
103.184.50.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
103.184.51.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
154.58.230.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
154.58.231.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2001:df2:5e40::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS149672
Address families
BIX Jakarta 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
CitraIX Surakarta 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
IIX-Jakarta 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
JKT-IX: Main 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS149672 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

2 networks seen before AS149672 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS136106 FIBERSTAR-AS-ID 1,101 1,778
v4 v6
AS134654 DATAUTAMA-NAP-IX 276 434
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS149672 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS147136 261 331
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 2
v4
AS35280 F5 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.