Skip to main content

AS132491

AFTCOMMS-AS-AP

AFT Communications Pty Ltd

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
132491
Name
AFTCOMMS-AS-AP
Organisation
AFT Communications Pty Ltd
Country
Flag of Australia AU Australia
RIR
APNIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

3

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS132491
103.73.84.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
103.73.84.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
103.73.85.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS132491
Address families
EdgeIX - Brisbane: Main 10,000 Mbps IPv4
EdgeIX - Sydney: Main 10,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS132491 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

3 networks seen before AS132491 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS137409 GSLNETWORKS-AS-AP 262 1,035
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 15 48
v4
AS64073 2 6
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS132491 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

5 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS4608 1 3
v4
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 3
v4
AS35280 F5 1 3
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 3
v4
AS132847 1 3
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.