Skip to main content

AS131933

TTV-NET

TAMA Television Co., Ltd

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
131933
Name
TTV-NET
Organisation
TAMA Television Co., Ltd
Country
Flag of Japan JP Japan
RIR
APNIC
Registered
—
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

5

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

6

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS131933
14.14.128.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
14.14.144.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
14.14.152.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
103.114.232.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
202.223.36.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
2400:3260::/32 IPv6 /32 RPKI not found

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS131933
Address families
JPIX TOKYO 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS131933 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

2 networks seen before AS131933 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS2516 KDDI 436 1,765
v4 v6
AS6939 HURRICANE 29 155
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS131933 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

7 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 56
v4 v6
AS1828 UNITAS 1 6
v4 v6
AS4777 APNIC-COLO 1 6
v4 v6
AS35280 F5 1 6
v4 v6
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 6
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 6
v4 v6
AS59105 HOMENOC 1 6
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.