Skip to main content

AS10015

CWJ-NET

Cyber Wave Japan Co., Ltd.

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
10015
Name
CWJ-NET
Organisation
Cyber Wave Japan Co., Ltd.
Country
Flag of Japan JP Japan
RIR
APNIC
Registered
—
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

3

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS10015
61.114.224.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
110.232.120.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
103.2.68.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS10015
Address families
JPIX TOKYO 100 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS10015 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

3 networks seen before AS10015 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS9351 ZLAN 222 442
v4
AS2519 VECTANT 181 430
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 37 127
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS10015 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

7 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS1828 UNITAS 1 3
v4
AS4777 APNIC-COLO 1 3
v4
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 3
v4
AS35280 F5 1 3
v4
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 3
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 3
v4
AS59105 HOMENOC 1 3
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.