Skip to main content

AS65000

Private use AS

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
65000
Name
Private use AS
Organisation
—
Country
—
RIR
—
Registered
—
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

7

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

7

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS65000
178.72.115.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
178.72.116.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.244.108.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
91.226.153.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
93.114.251.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
95.30.7.0/24 IPv4 /24 RPKI not found
95.30.82.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS65000 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

30 networks seen before AS65000 in AS paths

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

16 networks seen after AS65000 in AS paths

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

6 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS39668 AS-INTERSAT_CT 6 21
v4
AS17639 CONVERGE-AS 1 10
v4
AS328608 ORG-AOC1-AFRINIC 1 4
v4
AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-PK 1 3
v4
AS44735 SIP-ASN 1 1
v6
AS61349 MAXITEL 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.