Skip to main content

AS63872

IDNIC-AIT-AS-ID

PT Alam Informasi Teknologi

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
63872
Name
IDNIC-AIT-AS-ID
Organisation
PT Alam Informasi Teknologi
Country
Flag of Indonesia ID Indonesia
RIR
APNIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

6

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

6

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS63872
103.127.144.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
103.52.170.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
103.127.144.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
103.127.145.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
103.52.170.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
103.52.171.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS63872 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

2 networks seen before AS63872 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS147094 MVNET-AS-ID 209 1,713
v4
AS138840 HSP-NAP-AS-ID 80 567
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS63872 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

1 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS141600 IDNIC-VIRIYA-AS-ID 1 6
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.