Skip to main content

AS62459

DUBROVKA-AS

========================================================

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
62459
Name
DUBROVKA-AS
Organisation
========================================================
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

7

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

7

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS62459
185.35.36.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
185.35.36.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.35.37.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.35.38.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.35.39.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
46.243.60.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
46.243.61.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS62459
Address families
Eurasia Peering IX: Peering LAN 1,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS62459 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

3 networks seen before AS62459 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS35598 INETCOM 221 1,678
v4
AS42861 FOTONTELECOM-TRANSIT-AS 271 517
v4
AS62255 BEMYLINK 56 450
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS62459 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 12
v4
AS41327 FIBERTELECOM-AS 1 6
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.