Skip to main content

AS61134

SAFELOCKAS

Abuse: [email protected] phone: +48 666 666 041

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
61134
Name
SAFELOCKAS
Organisation
Abuse: [email protected] phone: +48 666 666 041
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

4

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

5

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS61134
195.20.212.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
109.197.35.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
188.137.118.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
194.169.126.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a02:c47:c::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS61134
Address families
EPIX.Katowice 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
EPIX.Warszawa 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
TPIX PL 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS61134 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

5 networks seen before AS61134 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS50607 462 1,420
v4 v6
AS6939 HURRICANE 30 136
v4
AS201054 21 70
v4 v6
AS62081 5 24
v4
AS6204 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS61134 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

3 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 45
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 10
v4 v6
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 5
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.