Skip to main content

AS5582

SSPW-WL-AS

Wojewodztwo Lubelskie

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
5582
Name
SSPW-WL-AS
Organisation
Wojewodztwo Lubelskie
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS5582
185.182.224.0/22 IPv4 /22 RPKI valid
185.113.32.0/23 IPv4 /23 RPKI valid
2a0a:fa80::/29 IPv6 /29 RPKI valid

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS5582
Address families
EPIX.Katowice 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
EPIX.Warszawa 40,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
TPIX PL 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS5582 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

5 networks seen before AS5582 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS29535 MIX2_OpenPeering 530 1,262
v4 v6
AS42739 FONE-ASN 244 640
v4 v6
AS48464 FUTUROEXITO-AS 193 578
v4 v6
AS201054 EPIX-PolMix 7 17
v4
AS6204 ZET-NET 3 7
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

2 networks seen after AS5582 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS203408 TELBIAL-AS 260 1,280
v4
AS198788 PL-URZAD-MARSZALKOWSKI-LUBLIN-AS 250 310
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

3 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 3 11
v4 v6
AS36236 NETACTUATE 3 8
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 3 8
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.