Skip to main content

AS51484

BLOKOWE

Sieci Blokowe S.C.

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
51484
Name
BLOKOWE
Organisation
Sieci Blokowe S.C.
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

5

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

6

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS51484
46.45.64.0/18 IPv4 /18 not checked
46.45.112.0/20 IPv4 /20 RPKI valid
46.45.80.0/20 IPv4 /20 RPKI valid
46.45.96.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
46.45.104.0/23 IPv4 /23 RPKI valid
2a03:24c0::/48 IPv6 /48 RPKI valid

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS51484
Address families
EPIX.Warszawa 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
Equinix Warsaw 10,000 Mbps IPv4
IX.LODZ.PL: LAN 1 10,000 Mbps IPv4
THINX Warsaw 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
TPIX PL 20,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS51484 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

14 networks seen before AS51484 in AS paths

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

5 networks seen after AS51484 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS208066 KSIEZYC 179 1,210
v4
AS206518 AMEDIA 161 519
v4
AS44856 GRS-AS 149 346
v4
AS201342 ERGONET1 133 159
v4
AS201054 EPIX-PolMix 20 43
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 4 21
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 4 13
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.