Skip to main content

AS51446

KATTELECOMNET

Argaev Artem Sergeyevich

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
51446
Name
KATTELECOMNET
Organisation
Argaev Artem Sergeyevich
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

2

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS51446
83.217.12.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
83.217.8.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS51446 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

9 networks seen before AS51446 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS3216 SOVAM-AS 121 322
v4
AS209307 CONVEX-EKB 212 258
v4
AS31133 48 115
v4
AS25091 IP-Max 4 14
v4
AS49434 2 4
v4
AS6663 1 2
v4
AS9198 1 2
v4
AS60171 1 2
v4
AS202984 team-host 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS51446 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

7 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 12
v4
AS28910 1 2
v4
AS29049 1 2
v4
AS37721 ORG-VTS1-AFRINIC 1 2
v4
AS41327 FIBERTELECOM-AS 1 2
v4
AS200612 GulfBridgeInternational 1 2
v4
AS209823 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.