Skip to main content

AS49290

WIESZOWANET-AS

ALICJA MANIERA trading as MANIERA SERVICE

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
49290
Name
WIESZOWANET-AS
Organisation
ALICJA MANIERA trading as MANIERA SERVICE
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

5

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

5

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS49290
62.122.232.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
185.242.252.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
193.25.248.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
91.195.92.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
91.198.89.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS49290
Address families
EPIX.Katowice 40,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
TPIX PL 40,000 Mbps IPv4
WRIX: WRIX 40,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS49290 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

4 networks seen before AS49290 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS29535 MIX2_OpenPeering 269 1,755
v4
AS35179 KORBANK-AS 27 145
v4
AS33891 CORE-BACKBONE 3 25
v4
AS6204 ZET-NET 1 5
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS49290 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

3 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 10
v4
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 5
v4
AS28917 Fiord-AS 1 5
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.