Skip to main content

AS47515

BMI-GOVIX

Bundesministerium fuer Inneres, Sektion IV

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
47515
Name
BMI-GOVIX
Organisation
Bundesministerium fuer Inneres, Sektion IV
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

7

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

8

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS47515
193.187.2.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
78.41.148.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
193.187.2.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
193.187.3.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
78.41.148.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
78.41.149.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
78.41.150.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a03:f080:1800::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS47515 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

2 networks seen before AS47515 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS1764 NEXTLAYER-AS 271 1,578
v4
AS1853 ACOnet 539 1,373
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS47515 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

1 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS6720 1 5
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.