Skip to main content

AS43798

NOVA-AS

OOO "NOVATEL"

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
43798
Name
NOVA-AS
Organisation
OOO "NOVATEL"
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

2

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS43798
91.195.170.0/24 IPv4 /24 RPKI not found
91.195.171.0/24 IPv4 /24 RPKI not found

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS43798 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

6 networks seen before AS43798 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS8732 COMCOR-AS 114 196
v4
AS12389 ROSTELECOM-AS 152 182
v4
AS8359 MTS 136 167
v4
AS8402 CORBINA-AS 16 19
v4
AS25091 IP-Max 4 7
v4
AS57681 ASN-MGTS-USPD2 4 6
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS43798 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

7 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 3
v4
AS28910 INTAL-ASN 1 1
v4
AS35598 INETCOM 1 1
v4
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 1
v4
AS41327 FIBERTELECOM-AS 1 1
v4
AS41722 MIRAN-AS 1 1
v4
AS49673 TRUENETWORK 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.