Skip to main content

AS43287

RU-VITNET-AS

====================================

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
43287
Name
RU-VITNET-AS
Organisation
====================================
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

5

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

6

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS43287
185.81.248.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
185.17.200.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.193.141.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.201.45.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
193.200.211.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a03:6660::/32 IPv6 /32 RPKI not found

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS43287 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

3 networks seen before AS43287 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS35598 INETCOM 471 1,739
v4 v6
AS62255 BEMYLINK 139 535
v4 v6
AS42861 FOTONTELECOM-TRANSIT-AS 115 395
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS43287 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS57449 ARENTEL-AS 300 385
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS49544 i3Dnet 2 12
v4
AS41327 FIBERTELECOM-AS 2 6
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.