Skip to main content

AS37302

ORG-DT2-AFRINIC

Dube TradePort

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
37302
Name
ORG-DT2-AFRINIC
Organisation
Dube TradePort
Country
—
RIR
AFRINIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS37302
102.130.40.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
41.78.232.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
2c0f:f450::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS37302
Address families
DINX: DINX Peering 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
NAPAfrica IX Durban 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
NAPAfrica IX Johannesburg: Peering 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS37302 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

6 networks seen before AS37302 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS11845 257 650
v4
AS36937 159 211
v6
AS6939 HURRICANE 113 197
v4 v6
AS3741 2 4
v4
AS37468 ORG-AC4-AFRINIC 2 2
v6
AS37497 ORG-NPL3-AFRINIC 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS37302 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS36924 1 2
v4
AS37239 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.