Skip to main content

AS35773

ICONNECT-AS

Pazardjik, Bulgaria

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
35773
Name
ICONNECT-AS
Organisation
Pazardjik, Bulgaria
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

5

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

6

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS35773
195.214.248.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
109.160.112.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
46.245.237.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
84.54.148.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
84.54.150.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a13:d880::/29 IPv6 /29 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS35773
Address families
B-IX 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
BIX.BG: Main 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
GNM-IX 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS35773 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

10 networks seen before AS35773 in AS paths

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS35773 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS49773 DEIMOS-AS 35 36
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

6 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 6
v4 v6
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 2
v6
AS48919 UA-CITY-AS 1 1
v6
AS199524 GCORE 1 1
v6
AS205112 PHILUNET 1 1
v6
AS208972 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.