Skip to main content

AS328658

ORG-DCIL1-AFRINIC

De Choicetech Integrated Ltd

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
328658
Name
ORG-DCIL1-AFRINIC
Organisation
De Choicetech Integrated Ltd
Country
RIR
AFRINIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

6

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

7

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS328658
102.212.255.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
102.220.172.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
102.220.173.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
102.220.174.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
102.220.175.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
102.223.1.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2c0f:920::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS328658
Address families
IXPN Lagos 20,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS328658 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

4 networks seen before AS328658 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS37662 1,417 4,065
v4 v6
AS36920 21 54
v4
AS37282 ORG-MCC1-AFRINIC 1 4
v4
AS60171 AFRIX-AS 1 4
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

3 networks seen after AS328658 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS328171 ORG-TNL3-AFRINIC 286 774
v4
AS329487 277 382
v4
AS329716 265 341
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 4
v4
AS37721 ORG-VTS1-AFRINIC 1 4
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.