Skip to main content

AS328482

ORG-STNL1-AFRINIC

SKY TREND NETWORKS LIMITED

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
328482
Name
ORG-STNL1-AFRINIC
Organisation
SKY TREND NETWORKS LIMITED
Country
RIR
AFRINIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

5

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

5

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS328482
102.67.152.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
102.67.152.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
102.67.153.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
102.67.154.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
102.67.155.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS328482
Address families
KIXP - Nairobi: Peering LAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
KIXP-Mombasa: Main 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
LINX Mombasa 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
LINX Nairobi 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS328482 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

3 networks seen before AS328482 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS58453 CMI-INT-HK 764 1,039
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 61 235
v4
AS60171 1 5
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

2 networks seen after AS328482 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS328953 274 355
v4
AS329411 248 324
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS328977 ORG-WISP2-AFRINIC 3 7
v4
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 5
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.