Skip to main content

AS328246

ORG-FRGL1-AFRINIC

Foschini Retail Group (Pty) Ltd

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
328246
Name
ORG-FRGL1-AFRINIC
Organisation
Foschini Retail Group (Pty) Ltd
Country
RIR
AFRINIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

3

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS328246
156.0.196.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
156.0.196.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
156.0.197.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS328246
Address families
NAPAfrica IX Cape Town 10,000 Mbps IPv4
NAPAfrica IX Johannesburg: Peering 10,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS328246 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

4 networks seen before AS328246 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS37100 439 602
v4
AS327782 ORG-MN2-AFRINIC 261 410
v4
AS37497 1 3
v4
AS58453 CMI-INT-HK 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS328246 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS65201 7 14
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Uncertain adjacencies

4 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS32653 1 3
v4
AS37239 1 3
v4
AS37721 ORG-VTS1-AFRINIC 1 3
v4
AS327983 1 3
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.