Skip to main content

AS327982

ORG-STSL1-AFRINIC

Sithabile Technology Services (Py) Ltd

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
327982
Name
ORG-STSL1-AFRINIC
Organisation
Sithabile Technology Services (Py) Ltd
Country
—
RIR
AFRINIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

5

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

6

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS327982
169.239.240.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
169.239.240.0/24 IPv4 /24 RPKI valid
169.239.241.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
169.239.242.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
169.239.243.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2c0f:f2d0::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS327982
Address families
JINX: JINX Peering 10,000 Mbps IPv4
NAPAfrica IX Johannesburg: Peering 40,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS327982 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

5 networks seen before AS327982 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS37271 ORG-WCL1-AFRINIC 350 666
v4 v6
AS327782 ORG-MN2-AFRINIC 213 279
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 37 43
v4
AS37468 ORG-AC4-AFRINIC 6 22
v4 v6
AS39120 CONVERGENZE-AS 1 3
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS327982 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

15 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.