Skip to main content

AS31409

SelTelecom-Net

Sel Telecom S.A.

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
31409
Name
SelTelecom-Net
Organisation
Sel Telecom S.A.
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

3

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS31409
195.137.246.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
195.137.246.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
195.137.247.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS31409
Address families
EPIX.Warszawa 1,000 Mbps IPv4
Equinix Warsaw 1,000 Mbps IPv4
THINX Warsaw 100,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS31409 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

9 networks seen before AS31409 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS12741 AS-NETIA 130 152
v4
AS20804 ASN-TELENERGO 103 125
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 40 90
v4
AS24115 ASN-EQIX-MLPE 11 22
v4
AS137409 GSLNETWORKS-AS-AP 7 14
v4
AS20853 ETOP-AS 10 12
v4
AS20485 TRANSTELECOM 4 8
v4
AS9009 M247 1 2
v4
AS13194 BITE 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS31409 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

3 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 18
v4
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 2
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.