Skip to main content

AS30975

TKK

Kotarbinskiego 3, 75-352 Koszalin

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
30975
Name
TKK
Organisation
Kotarbinskiego 3, 75-352 Koszalin
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

3

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

4

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS30975
83.145.128.0/18 IPv4 /18 not checked
77.92.32.0/19 IPv4 /19 not checked
91.197.148.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
2a02:478::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS30975 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

9 networks seen before AS30975 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS20804 ASN-TELENERGO 408 1,148
v4
AS12741 671 1,022
v4 v6
AS6939 HURRICANE 72 128
v4
AS137409 GSLNETWORKS-AS-AP 13 19
v4 v6
AS24115 ASN-EQIX-MLPE 13 13
v4
AS20485 TRANSTELECOM 4 4
v4
AS9009 M247 1 1
v4
AS13194 BITE 1 1
v4
AS24748 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

3 networks seen after AS30975 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS196728 390 584
v4 v6
AS39041 208 269
v4
AS197399 MIASTO_KOSZALIN 48 54
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Uncertain adjacencies

3 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 11
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 2
v4
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.