Skip to main content

AS26792

CSSNW

CSS Integration, Inc.

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
26792
Name
CSSNW
Organisation
CSS Integration, Inc.
Country
RIR
ARIN
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

1

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

2

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS26792
69.7.32.0/19 IPv4 /19 not checked
2604:3c80::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS26792
Address families
SIX Seattle: MTU 1500 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS26792 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

6 networks seen before AS26792 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS20055 AS-WHOLESAIL 252 324
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 121 159
v6
AS9002 RETN-AS 7 11
v4 v6
AS137409 GSLNETWORKS-AS-AP 6 7
v6
AS394256 CLOUDSINGULARITY 1 2
v4 v6
AS7575 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS26792 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

6 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 14
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 4
v4 v6
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 1 2
v4 v6
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 2
v4 v6
AS1828 UNITAS 1 1
v6
AS18106 VIEWQWEST-SG-AP 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.