Skip to main content

AS266487

ASN266487

ISM Telecom Eireli ME

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
266487
Name
ASN266487
Organisation
ISM Telecom Eireli ME
Country
Flag of Brazil BR Brazil
RIR
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

3

Total announced

5

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS266487
170.83.184.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
170.83.186.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
2804:3894::/33 IPv6 /33 not checked
2804:3894:9d00::/40 IPv6 /40 not checked
2804:3894:ca00::/40 IPv6 /40 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS266487 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

4 networks seen before AS266487 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS14840 ASN14840 685 1,591
v4 v6
AS264221 389 710
v4 v6
AS265019 23 32
v4 v6
AS1031 PEER1-1031 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS266487 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS266524 ASN266524 315 573
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Uncertain adjacencies

5 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS264479 2 9
v4 v6
AS52873 ASN52873 2 8
v4 v6
AS28624 2 6
v6
AS263152 1 2
v4
AS271253 ASN271253 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.