Skip to main content

AS215619

RCD-AS

RED COKE DEVELOPMENT LTD

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
215619
Name
RCD-AS
Organisation
RED COKE DEVELOPMENT LTD
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

0

IPv6 prefixes

4

Total announced

4

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS215619
2a0f:1cc5:1100::/48 IPv6 /48 RPKI valid
2a0f:1cc5:1101::/48 IPv6 /48 RPKI valid
2a0f:1cc5:1102::/48 IPv6 /48 RPKI valid
2a0f:1cc5:1103::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS215619
Address families
Kent Internet Exchange Point 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
Protocol 7 IX - Hong Kong 10,000 Mbps IPv6
Protocol 7 IX - Lycheen Japan 10,000 Mbps IPv6
STUIX 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
TYIX 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS215619 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

3 networks seen before AS215619 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS6939 HURRICANE 119 586
v6
AS215172 JIANYUELAB-AS 25 52
v6
AS44324 MOEDOVE-AS 22 39
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS215619 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 4
v6
AS38855 STUIX-AS-TW 1 4
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.