Skip to main content

AS215011

NXTHDR

Matthieu Gouel

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
215011
Name
NXTHDR
Organisation
Matthieu Gouel
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

0

IPv6 prefixes

5

Total announced

5

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS215011
2a06:de00:50::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked
2a0e:97c0:8a0::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked
2a0e:97c0:8a3::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked
2a0e:97c0:8a4::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked
2a0e:97c0:8a5::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS215011
Address families
FogIXP 1,000 Mbps IPv6
NL-ix: Main 100 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS215011 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

5 networks seen before AS215011 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS20473 AS-VULTR 438 1,327
v6
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 256 354
v6
AS47498 FogIXP 1 1
v6
AS205794 RTTW-AS 1 1
v6
AS209022 Tschajera-Limited 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS215011 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

6 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS8298 IPNG 1 1
v6
AS39351 ESAB-AS 1 1
v6
AS41666 PYRO-AS 1 1
v6
AS58299 OPENFACTORY-AS 1 1
v6
AS60326 DEADBEEF-AS 1 1
v6
AS209823 ENKI-AS 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.