Skip to main content

AS214161

RAFO

-------------------------------------------

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
214161
Name
RAFO
Organisation
-------------------------------------------
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

0

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

1

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS214161
2a0a:6044:aa11::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS214161
Address families
4b42 Internet Exchange Point: Switzerland 1,000 Mbps IPv6
BGP.Exchange - Amsterdam 1,000 Mbps IPv6
BGP.Exchange - Dusseldorf 1,000 Mbps IPv6
BGP.Exchange - Frankfurt 1,000 Mbps IPv6
FogIXP 1,000 Mbps IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS214161 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

6 networks seen before AS214161 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS212895 ROUTE64_ORG 145 195
v6
AS214757 Jakub-Krsa 102 140
v6
AS44324 MOEDOVE-AS 18 28
v6
AS213768 14 15
v6
AS8772 2 3
v6
AS29632 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS214161 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

1 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS215628 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.