Skip to main content

AS210233

Pixinko

Pixinko SARL

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
210233
Name
Pixinko
Organisation
Pixinko SARL
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

0

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

1

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS210233
2a0c:b641:870::/44 IPv6 /44 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS210233
Address families
LOCIX DUSSELDORF: Peering LAN 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
LOCIX FRANKFURT: Peering LAN 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
LOCIX NETHERLANDS: Peering LAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS210233 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

4 networks seen before AS210233 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS24961 MYLOC-AS 254 293
v6
AS25091 IP-Max 11 33
v6
AS34549 MEER-AS 6 32
v6
AS401753 BIXCE 8 23
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

8 networks seen after AS210233 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS219511 BE-SERGEKRIER-20260605 102 199
v6
AS218360 11 71
v6
AS218564 22 37
v6
AS211907 KATZE 30 33
v6
AS219488 Fidelir 20 20
v6
AS218667 15 15
v6
AS200202 RECUBE 11 11
v6
AS212625 CLEMENTD 5 5
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

6 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS199854 ITBYPASSION 8 23
v6
AS3214 XTOM 7 22
v6
AS210937 Showfom 7 22
v6
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 6 20
v6
AS56662 EUTPNET 4 18
v6
AS213151 CHRISELSEN 3 16
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.