Skip to main content

AS209059

GCOM-AS

|||||| IPv4 Routing policy |||||

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
209059
Name
GCOM-AS
Organisation
|||||| IPv4 Routing policy |||||
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

3

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS209059
176.124.196.0/24 IPv4 /24 RPKI valid
176.124.197.0/24 IPv4 /24 RPKI valid
93.177.126.0/24 IPv4 /24 RPKI valid

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS209059
Address families
PITER-IX Moscow: MSK_PEERING_VLAN 20,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS209059 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

6 networks seen before AS209059 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS50509 TRANSROUTE 82 306
v4
AS62255 BEMYLINK 31 105
v4
AS3216 SOVAM-AS 28 94
v4 v6
AS35598 INETCOM 14 45
v4
AS42861 FOTONTELECOM-TRANSIT-AS 8 30
v4
AS25091 IP-Max 3 9
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS209059 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

3 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 6
v4
AS37721 ORG-VTS1-AFRINIC 1 3
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 3
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.