Skip to main content

AS208825

REDLN-AS

ORG-NGs2-RIPE

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
208825
Name
REDLN-AS
Organisation
ORG-NGs2-RIPE
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

5

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

5

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS208825
109.248.38.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
46.243.254.0/24 IPv4 /24 RPKI not found
46.8.32.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
95.182.109.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
95.182.111.0/24 IPv4 /24 RPKI valid

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS208825
Address families
PITER-IX Moscow: MSK_PEERING_VLAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS208825 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

7 networks seen before AS208825 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS35598 INETCOM 334 1,491
v4
AS62255 BEMYLINK 66 382
v4
AS31133 MF-MGSM-AS 15 100
v4
AS25091 IP-Max 5 45
v4
AS137409 GSLNETWORKS-AS-AP 1 10
v4
AS9198 KAZTELECOM-AS 1 5
v4
AS50509 TRANSROUTE 1 3
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS208825 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS48916 KRAFTWAY 129 164
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

7 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 30
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 10
v4
AS37721 ORG-VTS1-AFRINIC 1 5
v4
AS41327 FIBERTELECOM-AS 1 5
v4
AS41722 MIRAN-AS 1 5
v4
AS49434 FBWNETWORKS 1 5
v4
AS205112 PHILUNET 1 5
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.