Skip to main content

AS206926

LETIT-AS

Letit LLC

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
206926
Name
LETIT-AS
Organisation
Letit LLC
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

7

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

7

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS206926
46.228.112.0/20 IPv4 /20 not checked
194.85.68.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
193.232.11.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
194.1.145.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
194.190.11.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
195.19.154.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
212.192.154.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

No Internet Exchange memberships found

The exchange directory has no current membership records for this AS.

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS206926 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

11 networks seen before AS206926 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS35598 183 1,524
v4
AS31500 66 567
v4
AS62255 BEMYLINK 38 316
v4
AS25091 IP-Max 4 49
v4
AS47692 2 28
v4
AS6663 1 7
v4
AS9198 1 7
v4
AS15958 1 7
v4
AS42295 TBISS-AS 1 7
v4
AS60171 1 7
v4
AS137409 GSLNETWORKS-AS-AP 1 7
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS206926 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

18 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.