Skip to main content

AS203140

NETUS

NETUS Renata Gieruszczak-Fikus

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
203140
Name
NETUS
Organisation
NETUS Renata Gieruszczak-Fikus
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

7

IPv6 prefixes

4

Total announced

11

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS203140
45.90.2.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
91.231.44.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
45.90.2.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
45.90.3.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
83.175.139.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
91.231.44.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
91.231.45.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a0c:6bc4::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a0c:6bc5::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a0c:6bc6::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked
2a0c:6bc7::/32 IPv6 /32 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS203140
Address families
EPIX.Katowice 5,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
EPIX.Warszawa 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS203140 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

3 networks seen before AS203140 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS9002 RETN-AS 465 1,984
v4 v6
AS12741 105 268
v4
AS201054 EPIX-PolMix 53 162
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS203140 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

3 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 54
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 18
v4 v6
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 9
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.