Skip to main content

AS203050

PNT_Opole_DC

Park Naukowo-Technologiczny w Opolu Sp. z o.o.

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
203050
Name
PNT_Opole_DC
Organisation
Park Naukowo-Technologiczny w Opolu Sp. z o.o.
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

4

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

4

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS203050
149.170.228.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
185.178.159.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
45.10.37.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
85.202.58.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS203050
Address families
EPIX.Katowice 10,000 Mbps IPv4
EPIX.Warszawa 10,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS203050 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

3 networks seen before AS203050 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS62081 EPIX-WAW-GlobalMix 273 1,644
v4
AS50607 EPIX-KTW-GlobalMix 57 298
v4
AS201054 EPIX-PolMix 2 10
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS203050 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS212663 remote-admin-as 160 1,182
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 2 20
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 2 10
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.