Skip to main content

AS201853

CatgirlCloud

Sophie Raven Tauchert

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
201853
Name
CatgirlCloud
Organisation
Sophie Raven Tauchert
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

0

IPv6 prefixes

3

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS201853
2a0c:b641:930::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked
2a0c:b641:931::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked
2a0c:b641:932::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS201853
Address families
FogIXP 1,000 Mbps IPv6
LOCIX DUSSELDORF: Peering LAN 1,000 Mbps IPv6
ixFabric - Dusseldorf 1,000 Mbps IPv6
ixFabric - Frankfurt 1,000 Mbps IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS201853 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

7 networks seen before AS201853 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 217 549
v6
AS34872 Servperso_Systems 225 303
v6
AS25091 IP-Max 4 13
v6
AS8298 IPNG 2 4
v6
AS47498 FogIXP 2 4
v6
AS209022 Tschajera-Limited 1 2
v6
AS401753 BIXCE 1 2
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS201853 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS199854 ITBYPASSION 1 2
v6
AS403001 MIRAGE-GLOBAL-TECH 1 2
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.