Skip to main content

AS201379

CHFOSTEDE-ASN

=========================================

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
201379
Name
CHFOSTEDE-ASN
Organisation
=========================================
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

0

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

1

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS201379
2a06:9801:1c::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS201379
Address families
EVIX: Peering LAN 1,000 Mbps IPv6
FogIXP 1,000 Mbps IPv6
LOCIX DUSSELDORF: Peering LAN 1,000 Mbps IPv6
PITER-IX Frankfurt 1,000 Mbps IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS201379 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

8 networks seen before AS201379 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 151 208
v6
AS20473 AS-VULTR 39 54
v6
AS41051 FREETRANSIT 29 39
v6
AS212895 ROUTE64_ORG 21 26
v6
AS34872 Servperso_Systems 18 23
v6
AS211509 RUDAKI-AS 2 2
v6
AS209022 Tschajera-Limited 1 1
v6
AS401753 BIXCE 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS201379 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

13 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.